CORRECT HEADING FORMAT
For ALL writing in this course your heading should be:
Your Name
Mrs. Decker
English II-CP or Honors
Due Date of the Assignment
Creative Title Here
MLA FORMAT
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/747/01/
CITATION HELP
http://www.citationmachine.net
WRITING RUBRIC
The following rubrics will be used to grade all writing assignments.
Writing Rubric – Decker Name _________________________________________ Grade _____________________
Description |
10 points |
8 Points |
6 Points |
4 Points |
2 Points |
MLA Format - Heading - Title - Margins - Typed - Double Spaced |
All Formatting is Correct |
Missing 1 |
Missing 2 |
Missing 3 |
Missing 4 or more |
Introduction |
Addresses and adds useful information about topic, great lead and background info |
Address useful info but lacking an appropriate lead orbackground info |
Lacks useful information and is missing an appropriate lead or background info |
Lacks useful information and is missing both an appropriate lead or background info |
Is completely off topic and is missing a lead and background information |
Thesis Statement |
Original, thoughtful and clear purpose, using subject, opinion, and terms |
Purpose is clear and has a clear subject, opinion, and terms |
Includes subject, opinion, and terms |
Is lacking a subject, opinion, or terms |
Has no clear thesis statement |
Evidence |
Excellent quotes (3) with MLA citations |
Useful quotes (3) with MLA citations |
Missing 1 quotes and /or citation |
Missing 2 quotes and/ or citations |
Missing quotes and/or citations |
Style, Convention, and Tone |
Text presents an engaging, formal, and objective tone. No use of “I” or “you” |
Text presents an appropriate tone for the majority of the paper. Very little use of “I” or “you” |
Informal language used often. “I” and “you” used throughout |
Frequent disregard for formal tone; “I” and “you” used throughout |
Complete disregard for formal tone; “I” and “you” used constantly. |
Analysis |
Clearly and thoughtfully relates to the topic, goes beyond obvious, in-depth |
Clearly relates to the evidence presented and adds original meaning |
Clearly relates to the evidence presented |
Is present |
Does not include sufficient analysis or is it not relevant |
Spelling and Punctuation |
No punctuation errors |
1-2 punctuation errors |
3-4 punctuation errors |
5-8 punctuation errors |
9+ punctuation errors |
Grammar |
No grammatical errors |
1-2 grammatical errors |
3-4 grammatical errors |
5-8 grammatical errors |
9+ grammatical errors |
Sentence quality |
A strong variety of sentence types including simple, compound, and complex. No run-ons or fragments |
Descent variety in sentence types; few run-ons or fragments |
Mostly simple sentences, causing paper to seem choppy; many fragments/run-ons |
Sentence structure is rarely there; many fragments and run-ons |
Sentences are incomprehensible with numerous fragments and run-ons |
Conclusion Paragraph |
Major points all recapped; clincher that revisits the hook; thesis is revisiting |
Most major points recapped; clincher weakly connects to hook; thesis revisited |
Few major points revisited; short conclusion with no clincher; thesis mentioned but with no rewording |
Major points not revisited; new information included; no clincher; no thesis |
Conclusion paragraph has no thesis, no major points, and lacks little relevance to the paper and its purpose. |